MyGZULibrary

Niversals of legal reasoning by judges : (Record no. 11440)

MARC details
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9780198785675
050 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number K 212
Item number LUN 2024
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Thomas, Lundmark,,
Relator term author.
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Niversals of legal reasoning by judges :
Remainder of title A Plea for candour in decision making /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Lundmark, Thomas.
264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture New York :
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer Oxford University Press,
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice 2024.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent pages cm
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE
Content type term text
Content type code txt
Source rdacontent
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE
Media type term unmediated
Media type code n
Source rdamedia
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE
Carrier type term volume
Carrier type code nc
Source rdacarrier
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. "The lion's share of the pages of this volume extract illustrations from judicial judgments that utilize one or more of a matrix of four varieties of legal argument inspired by the rich academic tradition of Germany. These varieties are denominated here as the textual, historical, purposive, and system-contextual. Briefly, textual justifications are those that are fashioned around the terms of a rule. Historical justifications focus on the circumstances surrounding the making or judicial modification of a rule. Purposive justifications explicitly employ the policies that a rule is said to promote. System-contextual justifications are those arguments that employ the terms analogical, reasonable, right, legal, constitutional, legitimate, appropriate, proportionate, fair, just, equitable, merciful, or in accordance with Treu und Glauben, good faith, the rule of law, or some other expression of justice. It is contended that this matrix of four is the most descriptive and convenient matrix of categories of legal argument. This book also exhibits dozens of instances in which judges erect a faȧde of disinterest and impartiality by stating or implying that a rule dictates a particular result when, in fact, the choice of argument or method is goal-oriented: the arguments merely serve to rationalize and justify decisions that the judges have reached"--
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Legal Reasoning
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Books
Classification part 212
Item part LUN
Call number prefix K
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Total Renewals Full call number Barcode Date last seen Date last checked out Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
        Law Library Law Library General Stacks 02/05/2025 3 2 K 212 LUN 2024 033820 03/31/2025 03/31/2025 C.1 02/05/2025 Books